New techniques of Electronic Health Records are to make the process of health care solution smoothly.
Training Tools of EHRs for Beginners |
Welcome to the company profile of Accretive Health. Accretive Health is a leading provider of healthcare revenue cycle management services.
Training Tools of EHRs for Beginners |
This has not been approved by the FDA, but it is in clinical trials. This is a pretty amazing device. CADence is the name of the device. For the trials what they are looking for are patients that already have issues to use the device to check for accuracy.
The device hums and works from sound waves and is able to identify blockages in the coronary arteries and there’s no radiation, and of course we like that. The device is to be used in an office setting and compared to the tests we do today who wouldn’t prefer this test and device. BD
The first time sound was described in conjunction with coronary artery disease was in a 1967 American Journal of Medicine article written by Dock W, and Zoneraich S. They detailed a high frequency diastolic/continuous murmur that was found along the left parasternal area at the 2nd, 3rd, or 4th intercostal spaces. This sound was correlated with moderate to severe proximal left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis. It was named “Dock’s Murmur.”
Here we go again with digital illits at the top of the helm making statements as such and anyone in technology knows there could be all kinds of glitches and issues unplanned that could pop up. It would make more sense to me that such a statement be held off until testing is done. They were not even going to test at first and again there’s the digital illit thinking again coming forward. After the Healthcare.Gov roll out “trust me” doesn’t mean much at all. Nobody in their right mind wants to sit back and delay for the sake of delaying it but you have to be a realist and take things a step at a time.
Nobody wants a roll out of ICD10 like Healthcare.gov do they? Billing companies and clearinghouses still need to do more testing as well. There’s money involved here as well as planning for additional time for rejected claims and extra time needed for reimbursement. Anyone who doesn’t think delays with payments won’t happen, better have their head examined. The AMA is still on their crusade to stall the implementation date as well. The US is the only country with such an intricate billing system with layers of complexities when you look at what other countries do.
But wait…if there’s a problem…well don’t hold your breath…much of the software is being sold with a “hold harmless” clause too…so spin the roulette wheel..you’re not going back on the developers for any malfunctions here.
One hospital had to go out and try to get a line of credit to plan for ICD10 as they are that close to where two months of delayed payments would shut the hospital down as they have almost no reserves. If there’s major glitches with payment it’s going to be a war out there for sure and for good reason.
Again I think such a statement would be better off made after some testing has been done, again it’s the anticipated delay with reimbursements that is the issue more so than just the software expense. BD
According to the announcement, providers that "represent a broad cross-section of provider types, claims types and submitter types" will submit test claims to CMS with ICD-10 codes and receive remittance advice explaining the adjudication of the claims. In addition, from March 3-7, CMS will offer ICD-10 acknowledgement testing. This front-end testing will allow all providers, billing companies, and clearinghouses the opportunity to determine whether CMS will be able to accept their claims with ICD-10 codes.
http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/news/CMS-holds-firm-on-ICD10-compliance-date-47313-1.html
Here we go again as the matter of complexities comes back around again. I have been writing about this for a while but we still have way too many out there counting on those “algorithm fairies” and have not landed on earth yet to at least get an understanding on how complex systems are today. Covered California was down for several days and just came back up Monday. I call it the “Sebelius Syndrome” since she was so public in so many statements that technologists knew were just pulled out of the sky with her perceptions. The Feds now have a former Microsoft Executive working on Healthcare.Gov.
One does also begin to wonder what the data looks like too at this point and how much corruption has to be taken out and that’s a given that has to be done with any data bases, need to be prepared and cleaned as no matter how good the software could be and with minimal flaws, corrupt data won’t run through it. Data gets corrupt just by being used and nobody’s at fault, just is what it is.
So now Oracle has pulled back on some of the programmers and 65 are left…ok did you guys get this 165 guys writing code for this project. Keep that in mind as it’s a big job and when the state decided to add more too it, that’s when the other contractors withdrew their bids and probably about now Oracle might be wishing they had too:) We had Rocky King resign and you know what, with the amount of pressure it’s enough to make anyone sick.
Let’s go back and once more again revisit a post I made several months ago…consumers and government are getting one real cold hard lesson here on complexities. It’s not like the good old days when things were in silos when you could yank and pull and migrate servers as everything is connected today. This is a big reason why I don’t want to write code anymore for any big projects..the geeks are always the losers, they can’t get it right fast enough and then you have the politicians with their perceptions of algorithms fairies too and they think they can control this, they can’t.
We have the stories of Massachusetts, Maryland and Minnesota out there too, so do you need anything else to hit you over the head to understand the complexities we have today and come to realize there are no “algorithm fairies” to wave a magic wand? The state of Oregon threw the monkey wrench into this one with adding part of their social services to the project which required 9 additional months of custom code.
I’m still rolling on this one (line below) with the Office of the Inspector General to audit and find out what went wrong on Healthcare.Gov. How many Oracle, MarkLogic, JBoss, Red Hat, etc. expert do they have to complete the audit? OIG just got dumped on for that one sadly. I don’t know why Sebelius just doesn’t keep quiet when she doesn’t know and uses her off the wall perceptions to keep sticking her foot in her mouth.
Yup that was another Sebelius “thingy” with shifting some attention over there.
If Oregon would have just built an exchange without all the other stuff added on, could have been different but that’s hind site now. The Sebelius Syndrome I’m sure lives at many levels with the state government in Oregon, otherwise they would have just built an exchange “only”. If Oracle leaves all together the next best thing is to start paying all over again with an “Oracle” gold partner and some new programmers as you still need code writers that can write to an Oracle system. BD
Exchange acting director Bruce Goldberg did not respond to a request for comment Wednesday afternoon.
In the past week about 100 Oracle employees have peeled off the Cover Oregon project, leaving approximately 65 in place. State officials have repeatedly blamed its failed health exchange website on Oracle’s shoddy work and missed deadlines.
Cover Oregon emerged this fall as a political and business disaster, both for state of Oregon and Oracle. The exchange stopped paying Oracle in September after it became clear it could not deliver the promised functional health care exchange on time. The firm had already been paid more than $90 million.
http://www.oregonlive.com/health/index.ssf/2014/02/oracle_pulls_100_programmers_f.html
He gets emails and lots of them. Providers are getting to the breaking point he says. Mostly what he is getting are people trying to figure out how to survive he says, IT Professionals are on the receiving end of the frustration. He’s the eternal optimist telling all they will survive. I would say not being there at HIMSS, this is probably the best and most realistic information you can hear. I don’t think folks outside of the industry realize how large and complex everything is and I guess you could say that HHS learned a hard lesson with Healthcare.Gov come to think of it.
She asks him how he manages everything he does. As an example we know ICD10 is not going to be on schedule and are waiting for the next announcement as right now those providers trying to get past the breaking point might break without relief here.
He gets a lot of Meaningful Use questions. He says some of the emails are group therapy. The doctor said he would make a brief appearance at HIMSS to hand out his book which is as I understand his entire blog put together in book form. Security he discusses with risk assessments and the fact that it will never be perfect. He has 14 different work streams. You can rad what he had to say about HIMSS at his blog here.
His book was available at the HIMSS bookstore. If there’s anyone who understands and can talk realistically about Health IT, it’s him and we don’t have to worry about any “algorithms fairies” or perceptual madness here at all when he speaks. BD
One thing for sure is that we all need food to survive and if you read here often enough then you know I focus on the use and abuse of data, for profit and when it is used out of context and for profit. Well the same thing we see in healthcare also exists with farming. Sure we want good food and better products and big data lurks over there too with “prescriptive planting”. You can read the entire article at the link at the bottom of the post but here we go again, same thing with data for profit. Look at how DuPont is filing lawsuits against farmers who saved “seeds”. Come on if seeds are there and can be used, plant them and don’t put a 75 year old farmer out of business for goodness sakes.
Look what happened in the UK with the NHS selling medical records to an insurance company. Sure I’m all for technology to help farmers by all means but the group makes some good points as far as their data they contribute being sold to commodities traders and that is a valid concern. Sure it is helping with production and the results have been mixed and we all want healthy food to eat but what's it going to cost us? Are we now paying for intellectual property on the food we eat too to support big corporations? All the planting information gets beamed to big servers.
The farmers also worry about competition amongst themselves too with the data and the same thing we have with housing, renting farm land next. Monsanto and DuPont so far said they have not sold the data and Deere shares the data with consent from the farmers. Farming by the algorithms…and the farmers all worry about the long term affect here with the data…just like we have seen with medical records moving from valuable clinical information as the number one priority to “data selling for profit”…with the old double swing to the pitch on some of it, the old bait and switch. If we want healthy food it looks like we are going to somewhere along line be paying for the intellectual properties of the seeds and the food it creates as well. BD
Monsanto Co. MON -0.17% , DuPont Co. DD +0.48% and other companies are racing to roll out "prescriptive planting" technology to farmers across the U.S. who know from years of experience that tiny adjustments in planting depth or the distance between crop rows can make a big difference in revenue at harvest time.
Some farmers are leery about the new technology. They worry their data might be sold to commodities traders, wind up in the hands of rival farmers or give more leverage to giant seed companies that are among the most enthusiastic sellers of data-driven planting advice. The companies vow not to misuse the information.
"There's a lot of value to that information," says Brooks Hurst, 46 years old, who works 6,000 acres with his father and brothers near Tarkio, Mo. "I'm afraid, as farmers, we are not going to be the ones reaping the benefit."
Many tractors and combines already are guided by Global Positioning System satellites that plant ever-straighter rows while farmers, freed from steering, monitor progress on iPads and other tablet computers now common in tractor cabs.
In 2012, DuPont hired Agro Protection USA Inc., an intellectual-property-protection firm staffed largely by retired law-enforcement officers, to watch for signs of farmers who are saving second-generation seeds. Saving the seeds violates licensing agreements farmers sign when they buy seeds.
Monsanto has filed lawsuits against nearly 150 U.S. farmers since 1997 for replanting seeds that contain the company's proprietary characteristics. Last year, the company won a U.S. Supreme Court victory in a case against an Indiana farmer who was 75 years old at the time.
This is an effort to try and help keep down re-admissions for one and the pharmacy is located on the hospital campus. It is not one of the retail clinics that Walgreens has all over the country but rather a unique drug store. As you can read pharmacists by law were given more authority with patient care. A while back, the medical records system used by Walgreens retail clinics is now made available to all drug stores too so no world if the pharmacists are going to create a medical record for the patient as used at the retail clinics, although the article does say the pharmacists will be putting together medication information the patients can take to their doctors. Greenway is the EMR used at the retail clinics.
We all know too that Walgreens makes between $1 to $2 billion a year selling data, so there’s the other side of this. I make sure I turn my location service on my phone off anymore when visiting either a Walgreens or CVS store. I don’t want their ads and don’t want to give away anymore profile data than I have to.
Must not be enough potential business though to put a full on retail clinic here perhaps? In addition we have this predictive model worked by United Healthcare with some Walgreen locations that want to predict when you are going to become a diabetic or are on the borderline…this provides pay for performance benefits for Walgreen pharmacists. BD
“Walgreens at UCSF is an ideal environment for our pharmacists to work with UCSF Medical Center and School of Pharmacy faculty to further innovate in health care while providing greater access to services for the surrounding community,” said Joel Wright, Walgreens divisional vice president, specialty solutions group. “At Walgreens, we are very pleased to share and develop best practices with UCSF pharmacists and pharmacy students, which further our commitment to help people get, stay and live well.” Walgreens at UCSF, located across the street from UCSF Medical Center, is one of Walgreens “Well Experience” stores, which offer expanded health services and are designed to foster increased patient-pharmacist interaction. With an expanded pharmacy including multiple areas for private consultations, Walgreens and UCSF pharmacists and UCSF pharmacy students are more accessible to community members and patients.
Core clinical health services include medication counseling by a pharmacist as the standard of care and comprehensive medication reviews for customers who receive prescriptions. Pharmacists will work with patients to create and update accurate, portable medication lists to take to their appointments with medical providers. This approach can help decrease drug-drug interactions and encourage patient medication adherence.
The new pharmacy model also comes on the heels of the California provider status law based on Senate Bill 493, which took effect Jan. 1, 2014, expanding the role of pharmacists on the patient care team. Under the new bill, pharmacists can perform additional healthcare responsibilities within the realm of their expertise, such as furnishing certain medicines, monitoring patient health and adjusting prescriptions, as needed.
The Staple Inn Actuarial Society – a major organization for UK insurers created the report on how it was able to use NHS data from a time from of 1997 to 2010 to track medical histories of patients using a DOB and post code. What do you hear about re-matching record, sure it happens all the time and here’s a prime example. Read further how it went to credit agencies next to use to increase premiums. This is why it will be a while before any patient matching algorithms will do the job in the US.
Below is an image on how all our prescription data is bought and sold by two of the biggest, United Healthcare and Intelliscript in the US. This in the UK should be a huge warning for the US as we know anyone who gets a hold of some data will query it and with what other data we don’t know and what type of analytics get created, we don’t know
Looks like the UK could also use some licensing on their data selling, just like I keep proposing here. Record sharing for research can be helpful but there’s always the other side that uses data for profit.
United Healthcare already has a strong foot in place with prescribing software in the UK, ScriptSwitch . In addition, Tony Blair’s old advisor who has been with United Healthcare in the US for a number of years is to be the new chief of the NHS April 1st. After this news…kind of makes one go hmmmm…who’s in charge, the NHS or the insurers?
“ScriptSwitch is installed in more than 7,500 GP practices, across over 160 NHS Clinical Commissioning Groups, NHS local health boards and NHS health boards throughout the United Kingdom.”
The Staple Inn Actuarial Society said that data covering all hospital in-patient stays between 1997 and 2010 was used to track patients' medical histories, identified by date of birth and postcode, according to the Daily Telegraph.
The details were then reportedly combined with information from credit ratings agencies and used to advise insurance companies, resulting in increased premiums for most customers below the age of 50.
The news comes at a time of heightened sensitivity about patient record confidentiality after the postponement of the NHS's massive care.data scheme. The project, which would be the first time that the entire medical history of the nation had been digitised and stored in one place, has been put on hold for six months.
http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/feb/24/hospital-records-nhs-patients-insurance
You can’t really talk about privacy without addressing the “epidemic” we have of data selling. You can’t regulate it without knowing who all the players are and as citizens of the US, we are given no clue at all other than reading the news and that only scrapes the surface. Little data figures in here as well as far as privacy as both lead to security breaches. Look what happened about a week ago in the UK with a bank, Barclays selling all kinds of personal client information…they had everything, income, health data, etc. and it was rolling around from one broker to another.
Senator Rockefeller recently sent letters to a number of data brokers.
We have absolutely nothing as consumers with the exception of HIPAA for medical records in the US. We have lawyers that work on the legal verbiage of laws while code and data run “hog ass wild” and banks and companies are racking in the billions selling data. We can’t have any privacy without an index of who everyone is and a license would do that plus raise a little tax money as it’s only fair as we also are the “free labor” who has to fix flawed data as we are denied access to something and those selling our data know it and could care less about a lot of accuracy.
ANY PRIVACY LAWS THAT DO NOT INCORPORATE DATA SELLING IT INFRASTRUCTURES FOR REGUALTION ARE LAWS WITH NO BALLS AND DO NOTHING FOR CONSUMERS AND THAT’S ALL THAT WE HAVE SEEN.
FTC efforts so far…totally useless.
Hope they accomplish something as time’s running out for the consumer and the data selling epidemic that substantiates lack of privacy continues to grow with nobody watching the show at all. BD
The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) and MIT are co-hosting a public workshop entitled “Big Data Privacy: Advancing the State of the Art in Technology and Practice” on March 3, 2014. This event is part of a series of workshops on big data and privacy organized by the MIT Big Data Initiative at CSAIL and the MIT Information Policy Project.
This workshop is also the first in a series of events being held across the country in response to President Obama’s call for a review of privacy issues in the context of increased digital information and the computing power to process it.
The workshop will convene key stakeholders and thought leaders from across academia, government, industry, and civil society for a thoughtful dialogue on the future role of technology in protecting and managing privacy. We will concentrate on core technical challenges associated with big data applications and provide a theoretical grounding for privacy considerations in large-scale information systems. We will explore the state of the art in privacy-protecting technologies and discuss how they can be applied to a diversity of big data applications
There’s not a lot that needs to be added here for comments..and this phone has Heart Monitor that you use your finger to get your rate.
They also introduced a new watch…but will we wear it?
It really is kind of funny to see the watch make another go at it as it’s been out before but consumers didn’t buy.
The new phone is due out in April. BD
BIG CON: We have to wait six weeks for this thing. The Galaxy S5 won't hit stores until April 11 in nearly 150 countries.
LabCorp did not buy the company, just the lab to be clear. The services of the lab will continue to be of service to clients, so no change there. In addition Covance was stopping work on it’s non finished site in Virginia and another location in Switzerland. Seattle is the location of the lab purchased by LabCorp.
LabCorp also purchased Medlab Indiana facilities for a little over $10 Million as it was bankrupt and filed for re-organization with over $40 million in debt. Cuts related to the Affordable Care Act were cited as part of the reasons that lead to bankruptcy with Medlab. BD
Additionally, the companies have entered into a five-year services agreement under which Covance and LabCorp will collaborate to continue offering the Seattle-based laboratory's services to clients.
LabCorp said in its LabCorp Clinical Trials Newsletter that the genomic analysis services offered by the Covance lab include gene expression studies, translational biomarker projects, and next-generation sequencing applications to support drug development work. Covance said it will provide other genomics services to its clients through its central laboratories.
Buying Vanguard was a big expenditure and they bought a big chunk of debt as well. This is what accounts for the 4th quarter loss. During the first quarter in 2013 Tenet lost $88 million, so they have been up and down.
Now we have the suit filed here, the result of a whistle blower for referral payments. Admissions were down the 4th quarter as well they were pretty much across the US.
In addition we have the CommonWell news that the hospital system will use their system to exchange records and will work with CommonWell on the next phase of “patient matching”…that one requires some real ass kicking algorithms so the group will be working on that for a few years. The document query and retrieval services will show up long before the matching I believe. A couple years ago Community Hospital System was trying to take over Tenet. Tenet also has a couple of technology subsidiary companies.
In addition Tenet signed a new 2 year agreement with Aetna which also covers those with Coventry, which is also owned by Aetna. The original lawsuit was filed in 2009 and Claims Florida Health management Associates entered into contracts that referred pregnant women in the US to hospitals operated by HMA and Tenet for kickbacks from Medicaid claims that were fraudulent in nature. Four Tenet hospitals are involved along with one HMA hospital. HMA recently by the way had to send money back to CMS as 11 of their hospitals did not meet Meaningful Use criteria. A lot of Tenet news all at once. BD
The disclosure this week comes as Tenet has tried to reshape its image and operations since 2006, when it reached a $900 million settlement, one of the largest ever, with the U.S. Justice Department to resolve fraud accusations.
The new investigation alleges that four Tenet hospitals in Georgia and South Carolina made improper payments in return for patient referrals. Both investigations also were triggered by whistle-blower lawsuits filed under the U.S. False Claims Act, leading federal authorities to intervene as plaintiffs.
The FBI said in its release that the hospitals paid kickbacks to obstetric clinics serving “undocumented Hispanic women.’’ The money was in exchange for providing labor and delivery services to the patients. The hospitals then falsely billed Medicaid for reimbursements tied to the procedures, the statement said.
Medical Billing Provides Best Practices |